RELIGION, CODEPENDENCY & PEOPLE-PLEASING: WHEN BELONGING REQUIRES SELF-ABANDONMENT
Religion and identity can get really tangled up with each other (enmeshed, even, if you want the therapist word for it). Religion can give us community, rituals, values, traditions, spirituality and a whole framework for understanding ourselves and the world, and for a lot of people that's meaningful and freely chosen. I want to say that up front, because this isn't a post about religion being bad. Religion doesn't AUTOMATICALLY create codependency, people-pleasing or trauma. What I'm curious about is what happens when belonging starts to depend on being obedient, selfless, agreeable or a very specific kind of "good."
The tricky part is that a lot of the qualities that get praised in religious spaces, like being selfless, serving others, forgiving quickly, submitting to authority, avoiding contention and putting everyone else first, look almost identical to what we'd call people-pleasing anywhere else. Serving, forgiving and sacrificing for people aren't the problem. The question I keep coming back to is whether you actually had a choice. What happens when being good requires being agreeable, or saying no feels selfish, or disappointing someone feels like a sin? And what happens when belonging starts to require abandoning parts of yourself?
BELONGING IS A REALLY POWERFUL THING
We're wired for connection!! We want people who know us, care about us and count us as theirs, and religious communities can meet that need in really profound ways. Honestly, that can be one of the most beautiful parts of religion. Belonging gets complicated when it feels CONDITIONAL. If staying connected depends on believing the right things, behaving the right way and filling the right roles, you're going to get very good at noticing what keeps you safely inside the circle. You learn which parts of you get approval and which parts make people uncomfortable, what makes you "good," and what could make you rebellious, selfish, worldly or "falling away."
Nobody has to say out loud, "We'll reject you if you change," for your brain to pick up on the rules. Sometimes you learn them through praise and correction, sometimes through doctrine or family expectations, and sometimes just by watching what happened to the last person who stepped outside the lines. When belonging matters this much, bending yourself to keep it makes complete sense.
WHEN SELFLESSNESS BECOMES SELF-ABANDONMENT
I really don't think selflessness is unhealthy! Caring for people matters, generosity matters, and service can be some of the most meaningful stuff in life. Sometimes we give something up because someone matters to us, and that choice genuinely reflects who we want to be. But there's a big difference between CHOOSING to be selfless and believing that having a self is selfish.
If you learned over and over that goodness means putting yourself last, you might eventually lose track of when you're allowed to consider yourself at all. Having needs feels demanding. A boundary feels unkind. Saying no to a calling, a church responsibility or a family expectation doesn't feel like knowing your capacity; it feels like failing morally. That's where religious values and people-pleasing get knotted together: you stop asking "what would be kind?" and start asking "what do I have to do to still be a good person?" Those are really different questions!
WHERE CODEPENDENT PATTERNS COME IN
I use the word codependency carefully, because it isn't a diagnosis and I don't find it very helpful to sort people into "codependents" and everyone else. I'd rather talk about codependent PATTERNS: over-functioning for other people, feeling responsible for their emotions or choices, struggling to know what you need, getting your worth from being needed, or not being able to tell where caring ends and responsibility begins. Certain religious messages overlap with those patterns a lot. Maybe your job was to help everyone else stay on the right path, so their choices felt partly like yours. Maybe you were supposed to forgive without much room for anger or hurt. Maybe service became the main way you knew you mattered, and you got really, really good at noticing what everyone else needed while losing track of yourself.
None of that means religion CAUSED it. Family dynamics, attachment, temperament and culture can create the exact same patterns. What religion can do is give those patterns moral weight. "I should take care of everyone" becomes "taking care of everyone is what makes me good." "I'm scared to disappoint people" becomes "disappointing people means I'm selfish." "I struggle with boundaries" becomes "a loving person would always give more." And once a pattern feels like righteousness, questioning it can feel like questioning your whole moral compass.
WHEN PEOPLE-PLEASING FEELS LIKE BEING A GOOD PERSON
People-pleasing gets reduced to "wanting everyone to like you," but it usually runs a lot deeper than that. It's often a way of staying safe and connected: you track what people need, how they're feeling and which version of you will keep the relationship steady. In religious spaces there can be extra layers on top. You might not just be trying to please your parents or your community; you might be trying to please God. Someone's disappointment can feel tied to a much bigger fear that you're doing something morally wrong, and disagreeing with a leader who's believed to have spiritual authority doesn't feel like disagreeing with a regular person.
So it gets really hard to tell where your values end and the fear begins. Am I doing this because I believe it's right, or because I'm scared of what happens if I don't? Am I serving because I want to, or because saying no makes me feel guilty? Am I forgiving because I'm ready, or because anger feels spiritually off-limits? Sometimes the answer is both, and that's okay :) The point isn't to interrogate every kind thing you've ever done. It's to get curious about how much freedom there actually is inside your choices.
THE FAWN RESPONSE & RELIGIOUS ENVIRONMENTS
The fawn response describes appeasing or accommodating behavior that shows up when something feels threatening. I think it's useful language, though I don't love treating fight, flight, freeze and fawn like four tidy boxes that explain everyone's nervous system. What I care about is what the appeasing is doing for you. If disagreeing, saying no, getting angry or believing something different has threatened your safety or your belonging before, getting agreeable makes total sense. You read the room. You figure out what people want. You soften your opinions, make yourself useful and get really skilled at keeping everyone comfortable.
In some religious environments the threat isn't only about people, either. It can include fear of spiritual consequences, losing your community, devastating your family, risking an eternal relationship or becoming the kind of person you were warned about your whole life. That makes compliance feel incredibly high-stakes, and those strategies don't switch off when you leave the place where you learned them. They follow you into friendships, dating, marriage, work... and yes, into therapy too.
AUTHORITY CAN COMPLICATE SELF-TRUST
Most religions involve some kind of authority: scripture, tradition, doctrine, clergy, leaders, parents or the community's take on what God expects. Authority isn't automatically unhealthy! The question is what happens when your own experience doesn't line up with it. Are you allowed to question? Are leaders allowed to be wrong? Can you disagree without being called prideful, deceived or rebellious? Can you make a different choice and still belong?
When the answer keeps being no, a lot of us learn to stop trusting ourselves. Instead of "what do I think?" we look for someone to tell us. Instead of "what do I need?" we ask what we should be willing to sacrifice. Instead of "does this feel okay to me?" we ask whether we're even allowed to feel uncomfortable. So healing often ends up being about way more than learning to say no. It's about rebuilding a relationship with your own judgment.
GUILT & SHAME CAN MAKE SEPARATION FEEL DANGEROUS
Guilt can actually be useful! If I act against my values or hurt someone, guilt helps me notice and repair it. Shame is different: guilt says "I did something that doesn't fit who I want to be," and shame says "something is wrong with me." Religious environments vary a lot in how they handle guilt, shame, forgiveness and being imperfect, but where shame and fear are tied to obedience and belonging, questioning anything can feel intense.
You can know you're allowed to make your own decision and still feel sick with guilt when you do. You can stop believing something is a sin and still feel scared doing it. You can understand that a boundary is healthy and still feel like a terrible person afterward. That's because our emotional learning doesn't update the second our beliefs do (I wish it did!). A lot of the healing comes from making your own choices again and again, riding out the guilt or fear that shows up, and slowly learning that an uncomfortable feeling doesn't automatically mean you did something wrong.
PEOPLE-PLEASING CAN CONTINUE AFTER RELIGION
One of the things I find most interesting is what happens when someone leaves or deconstructs a religion but keeps the relational rules they learned inside it. Maybe you don't believe you have to sacrifice yourself to be righteous anymore, but you're still the one who always says yes. Maybe you rejected the role you were given but still feel responsible for everyone's feelings. Maybe you believe in your own autonomy on paper and still panic when someone disapproves of you.
That can be so confusing: I don't even believe this anymore, so why am I still doing it?! Because beliefs aren't the ONLY thing we learn. We learn roles. We learn what connection feels like, what happens when someone is disappointed in us and what we're supposed to do when a relationship feels shaky. Leaving a belief system doesn't erase all of that on its way out.
HEALING DOESN'T MEAN BECOMING THE OPPOSITE PERSON
If religion taught you to care about people, healing doesn't mean you have to stop caring. If service, generosity, forgiveness, community or spirituality genuinely matter to you, they get to stay! You don't have to throw out every good quality just because religion helped shape it. What we can look at instead is whether those qualities have any flexibility. Can I serve and still say no? Can I forgive and admit I was hurt? Can I love someone and disappoint them? Can I care about my community and disagree with it? That flexibility is the difference between a value and a requirement, and they feel really different from the inside.
FIGURING OUT WHAT'S ACTUALLY YOURS
Deconstruction usually gets described as figuring out what you don't believe anymore, but figuring out what you want to keep matters just as much. Maybe compassion still matters deeply to you, or service, or spirituality, or family, or community. The difference is that now you get to be curious about WHY. You get to notice when kindness turns into self-abandonment, when empathy turns into over-responsibility, when service becomes the price of your worth, or when belonging starts asking you to get smaller.
And then you get to experiment. Maybe you say no and let someone be disappointed. Maybe you name a need without explaining why you're allowed to have it. Maybe you make a decision before polling everyone you know, let yourself be angry without rushing to forgive, or let someone misunderstand you without spending the whole evening trying to fix it. Those moments might look small from the outside, but they're huge when you've spent years learning that safety meant being whoever everyone else needed. Healing from people-pleasing after religion isn't about caring LESS. It's about making enough room in your relationships for you to exist too.
If this resonates with you, especially if religion shaped your relationship with people-pleasing, self-sacrifice, authority, boundaries, guilt or trusting yourself, this is something we can explore together in therapy. Learn more about how I work with religious trauma →
credit: www.instagram.com/verysickinhumancreature